by C. Casquatch
Please see the bottom of this post for some sick references if you want to enjoy more rabbit hole tamagotchi hacking things
This is the second half of the Tamagotchi project. In the first post I decapped the chip, exposed the die, and ran straight into a wall: my microscope can’t resolve enough detail to read the silicon. The decap can work if I show more refrain with the dremel and I get access to a better microsope.
So I changed tack. If I can’t read the chip, maybe I can get the firmware out electrically — find a serial interface on the board, solder onto it, and listen. This is the story of that attempt, the research I leaned on, and why it ended where it did.
It’s a failure write-up, mostly. But it’s a useful one.
A note on what this board actually is. I bought this advertised as a “Gen 2” Tamagotchi, but the board is marked
No: 42800VR5and dated2024-3-20— so it’s modern-production hardware in a classic-style shell. “Gen 2” here describes the gameplay generation and shell it imitates, not the silicon inside. I don’t know the exact part under the epoxy: it could be running the classic ROM on a modern low-cost controller. What I can say for certain, from my own probing, is that it’s a chip-on-board design with no accessible serial interface. Where I’d otherwise have asserted “it’s a simple 90s ASIC,” I’m instead leaving the generation an open question, because that’s the my position.
The dream was UART. A lot of embedded devices leave a debug serial line exposed on the PCB — test pads the factory used for programming or QA that still spew boot output if you connect to them. If the Tamagotchi had one of those, the chip would happily tell me what it was doing on power-up, and possibly let me dump flash.
Before touching the iron I read everything I could find. The cornerstone is Natalie Silvanovich’s (natashenka) Tamagotchi work — the 29C3 talk and the Tamagotchi-Hack repo. The thing that stuck with me reading her work and the follow-on community write-ups: classic Tamagotchi hardware is built as a closed, deliberately-minimal toy with no friendly debug door, which is exactly why the early ROM extraction was hard. That tradition of being locked-down by design held true for my board too, whatever the exact chip turned out to be. I went looking anyway, because the point was to learn and fail.


The back of the board gives you a lot to work with on paper: a full row of test points (TP1 through TP15), clearly labelled BAT+, BAT-, GND, a RESET pad, and two buzzer pads (BZ1, BZ2). Promising-looking. The plan was simple:
With batteries in and BAT- as my ground reference, I went down the test points one at a time looking for anything that behaved like a UART line — something sitting near rail at idle that pulses during boot.
Two pads gave me something: two test points both reading ~2.2V. On a 3V system, a pad pulled up to ~2.2V rather than full rail is exactly what an idle UART line looks like when there’s a series resistor inline — and two of them reading the same value is what you’d expect from a TX/RX pair, both floating high at idle. That looked, on paper, like a found interface.
Everything else read a flat 0V, including the labelled BAT- which confirmed my ground reference. So the working theory was: two 2.2V pads = TX and RX, BAT- = GND, go listen.


I tinned and soldered thin wire onto the two 2.2V pads and onto BAT- for ground. These pads are tiny and lift if you dwell on them, so it’s a flux-and-tap job, under two seconds each.
The right order here is logic analyser first, UART adapter second. The analyser is passive — it just listens, can’t damage anything — and it’ll tell you both whether there’s any activity and what the baud rate is by measuring the pulse widths. Only once you know there’s real traffic do you swap to the UART adapter to actually talk.
My analyser is a Saleae Logic clone running fx2lafw, driven from sigrok-cli. The capture looked like this:
# raw capture — just confirm there's ANY activity on the two candidate pads
sigrok-cli -d fx2lafw --channels D5,D7 \
--config samplerate=1m \
-o capture.sr \
--time 5s
Start the capture, then power-cycle the Tamagotchi so you catch the boot window. And to try decoding UART live across the usual baud rates:
sigrok-cli -d fx2lafw --channels D5,D7 \
--config samplerate=1m \
-P uart:rx=D5:tx=D7:baudrate=115200 \
--time 5s
I ran it at 115200, then 57600, 38400, 19200, 9600. I swapped which pin was RX and which was TX.
Nothing. No pulses on power-up, no garbage, no traffic at all.
Empty captures narrow things down to a few possibilities — flaky solder joints, a signal too fast for the window — but after re-seating the wires and re-running, the honest conclusion is the simplest one:
Those 2.2V pads were voltage bleed from internal pull-ups, not an active serial line.
Classic-style Tamagotchi hardware is built as a closed, deliberately-minimal toy. There’s no reason for it to carry a hobbyist-accessible debug UART — Bandai gains nothing by exposing one. The test points scattered across the back of the board are almost certainly bed-of-nails manufacturing test contacts — pads the factory used for QA on the production line, not a debug or programming interface. Whether the silicon under the blob is a genuine vintage ASIC or a modern low-cost controller re-running the classic ROM, the result for me is the same: nothing to talk to. A reading of 2.2V on a multimeter is just a high-impedance pad floating; it looks identical to an idle UART line on a meter, which is exactly the trap I walked into.
The interface I thought I’d found didn’t exist.
Both routes are now spent, in their current form:
The next options from here are more invasive — desoldering and directly reading a ROM/flash part, or getting the die under proper SEM-grade magnification — both of which need kit I don’t currently have. There’s also the boring shortcut I deliberately skipped: the community has already dumped Gen 1 and Gen 2 ROMs, so the data exists. But downloading someone else’s dump was never the point. The point was to read mine.
There’s a more promising future target sitting in plain sight, though. The newer WiFi Tamagotchi — the Uni — is built on an ESP32-S3, which is a documented, open platform with real community tooling and an actual debug UART. That’s a device you can genuinely flash custom firmware onto, assuming Bandai didn’t lock it down with flash encryption. The TamaHacks wiki is tracking exactly that. That’s likely where this project goes next — from reading a Tamagotchi to running my own code on one.
sigrok-cli + fx2lafw for Saleae Logic clones).